 |
 |
 |
| 2004 |
 |
|
 |
 |
| 08/27/04 |
 |
Judge Declines to Recuse Herself in Metropolitan Opera Case: Metropolitan Opera Association, Inc. v. Local 100, Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees Int'l Union |
 |
| 08/20/04 |
 |
Court Orders Transfer of Domain Names in Trademark and Unfair Competition Case: Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Otamedia Limited |
 |
| 08/17/04 |
 |
Federal Court in California Orders Sanctions for Using Wiping Software to Delete Files: AdvantaCare Health Partners, LP v. Access IV |
 |
| 07/21/04 |
 |
Philip Morris, Key Executives Sanctioned $2.75 M for Deleting E-mails: United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. |
 |
| 07/20/04 |
 |
UBS Warburg Sanctioned Yet Again in Zubulake Case: Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC. |
 |
| 07/19/04 |
 |
Printing Costs Not Recoverable if Electronic Documents Requested: Zenith Electronics Corp. v. WH-TV Broadcasting Corp |
 |
| 07/02/04 |
 |
4th Circuit Affirms Protective Order in Electronic Discovery Dispute: Nicholas v. Wyndham International, Inc. |
 |
| 05/27/04 |
 |
Court Allows Seizure of Home Computer Before Searching It For Relevant Evidence: In re Search of 3817 W. West End, First Floor Chicago, Ill |
 |
| 05/07/04 |
 |
Court Declines to Strike Electronic Evidence Found After Discovery Deadline, Shifts Cost to Defendant: YCA v. Berry |
 |
| 04/21/04 |
 |
Court Establishes New Three Part Test for Determining Necessity of Preservation Orders: Capricorn Power Company, Inc. v. Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation |
 |
| 04/09/04 |
 |
Court: If Electronic Evidence is Searchable, Responsive Party Need Not Organize It: Zakre v. Norddeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale |
 |
| 03/26/04 |
 |
Lawsuit Dismissed After Plaintiff Tries to Deceive Court With Fake E-mail: Munshani v. Signal Lake Venture Fund II |
 |
| 03/19/04 |
 |
Noting Document Mishandling in Similar Case, Court Orders Gov't. Preserve Electronic Documents: Pueblo of Laguna v. United States |
 |
| 03/15/04 |
 |
Default Judgment Entered Against Defendant Violating Temporary Restraining Order By Destroying Electronic Evidence: QZO, Inc. v. Moyer |
 |
| 03/11/04 |
 |
Recovered E-mail Helps Company Prove Former President Stole Business, Opened Competing Firm: In re Sullivan |
 |
| 03/02/04 |
 |
Having No Proof That Relevant Electronic Evidence Was Erased, Court Declines to Sanction Plaintiff for Spoliation: Invision Media Communications, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Co. |
 |
| 02/18/04 |
 |
Discovery Stay Not Needed if Defendant Acknowledges Duty to Preserve Electronic Evidence: In re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Research Reports Securities Litigation |
 |
| 02/10/04 |
 |
Use of "Wiping" Software Results in an Adverse Inference Instruction: Anderson v. Crossroads Capital Partners, L.L.C |
 |
| 02/18/04 |
 |
Discovery Stay Not Needed if Defendant Acknowledges Duty to Preserve Electronic Evidence: In re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Research Reports Securities Litigation |
 |
| 01/30/04 |
 |
Sanctions Denied After Plaintiffs Fail to Request Appointment of Computer Forensic Expert: Aero Products International, Inc. v. Intex Recreation Corporation |
 |
| 2003 |
 |
|
 |
 |
| 12/05/03 |
 |
Court Orders Plaintiff to Retain Computer Forensic Expert in Expedited Electronic Discovery Request: Physicians Interactive v. Lathian Systems, Inc |
 |
| 12/03/03 |
 |
Computer System Inspection Not Justified by Mere Suspicion of Incomplete Discovery: Bethea v. Comcast |
 |
| 10/27/03 |
 |
Court: Defendant Should Have Preserved Electronic Evidence Likely to be Subject to Discovery Request: Wiginton v. Ellis |
 |
| 10/22/03 |
 |
Zubulake Judge Denies Adverse Inference as Lost Evidence Does Not Support Plaintiff's Claims: Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC |
 |
| 09/22/03 |
 |
Appellate Court Vacates an Unlimited Electronic Discovery Order: In re Ford Motor Company |
 |
| 08/29/03 |
 |
Government's Records Retention Policy Led to Spoliation of Evidence Claim: Renda Marine, Inc. v. United States |
 |
| 08/28/03 |
 |
Internet Service Provider Tricked Into Violating the Electronic Communications Privacy Act: Theofel v. Farey-Jones, amended and superseded |
 |
| 07/29/03 |
 |
Corporate E-mail Disclosed by Mistake is Privileged: Blumenthal v. Kimber Manufacturing, Inc |
 |
| 07/24/03 |
 |
EPA Sanctioned and Held in Contempt for Violating Court Order to Preserve Electronic Evidence: Landmark Legal Foundation v. Environmental Protection Agency |
 |
| 06/30/03 |
 |
Mass E-mails Sent to Intel Corporation By Ex-Employee Not Considered Trespass: Intel Corporation v. Hamidi |
 |
| 06/26/03 |
 |
Ninth Circuit: Defendant Lacked Standing To Object To Computer Search of Former Employer's Laptop: United States v. Wong |
 |
| 06/03/03 |
 |
Despite Privilege Concern, District Court Declined to Shift Cost of Electronic Discovery Request:
Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Quest Software, Inc. |
 |
| 05/27/03 |
 |
Court Recommends Dismissal With Prejudice in Patent Case After Plaintiff "Shreds" Computer Files:
Kucala Enterprises, Ltd. v. Auto Wax Company, Inc. |
 |
| 05/13/03 |
 |
Court Ordered Cost-Shifting For Large Electronic Evidence Discovery Request: Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. v. Michelson |
 |
| 02/05/03 |
 |
Court Affirmed Preliminary Injunction To Freeze Electronic Data for Future Discovery:
Dodge, Warren & Peters Insurance Services, Inc. v. Riley |
 |
| 2002 |
 |
|
 |
 |
| 12/26/02 |
 |
Nevada Supreme Court Rules That a Document Transmitted by E-mail is Subject to Attorney-Client Privilege:
City of Reno v. Reno Police Protective Association |
 |
| 11/04/02 |
 |
CEO Lacked Standing to Challenge Computer Forensic Examination of Company-Owned Laptop:
United States v. Triumph Capital Group, Inc. |
 |
| 09/26/02 |
 |
Appeals Court Authorizes Sanctions After Computer Forensic Examination Finds 950,000 "Nonexistent" E-mails:
Residential Funding Corporation v. DeGeorge Financial Corp. |
 |
| 09/13/02 |
 |
Computer Forensic Examination Upheld on Appeal:
State v. Cook |
 |
| 09/13/02 |
 |
Online Market Research Firm Violated Electronic Communications Privacy Act:
In re Pharmatrak |
 |
| 06/05/02 |
 |
California Court of Appeals Rules That a Printout of Computer's Internal Operations is Not Hearsay:
People v. Hawkins |
 |
| 05/03/02 |
 |
Computer Forensic Specialist Finds Deliberate Attempt to Destroy or Conceal Electronic Data in Trade Secrets Case:
RKI, Inc. v. Grimes |
 |
| 04/29/02 |
 |
District Court Appoints Neutral Computer Forensics Expert in Copyright Case Involving Competing Businesses:
Antioch Co. v. Scrapbook Borders, Inc |
 |
| 04/03/02 |
 |
Ninth Circuit Reversed Lower Court Ruling That E-mail Was Hearsay:
Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Lozen International, LLC |
 |
| 03/29/02 |
 |
Interior Department Sanctioned for Resisting E-mail Discovery Request:
Cobell v. Norton |
 |
| 03/07/02 |
 |
Computer Forensics Examination Ordered To Determine Compliance With Preservation Order:
In re Triton Energy Limited Securities Litigation |
 |
| 02/22/02 |
 |
Company-Owned Computer Used by Employee At Home is Subject to Discovery:
TBG Insurance Services Corporation v. Superior Court |
 |
| 02/11/02 |
 |
Microsoft Averts Civil Rights Action Due to Plaintiff's Egregious Discovery Abuses and Misrepresentations in Court:
Jackson v. Microsoft Corp |
 |
| 2001 |
 |
|
 |
 |
| 10/17/01 |
 |
Law Firm Disqualified After Nonlawyer Employee Improperly Conducted Computer Forensic Analysis:
Richards v. Jain |
 |
| 07/06/01 |
 |
Search of Cell Phone's Memory Upheld on Appeal:
United States v. Wiseman |
 |
| 05/31/01 |
 |
Electronic Evidence Used in Custody Dispute Despite Claims of Wiretap Act Violation:
White v. White |
 |
| 1999 |
 |
|
 |
 |
| 08/22/99 |
 |
Nevada Supreme Court Rules That a Document Transmitted by E-mail is Subject to Attorney-Client Privilege:
Intel Corporation v. Hamidi |
 |